Getting ChatGPT to make a version of ELIZA from some random ELIZA code downloaded from the internet
You said:
what does the elizer script ii gave you run in?
ChatGPT said:
The ELIZA script you provided (eliza.txt) is a JavaScript-based ELIZA implementation intended to run in a web browser. It appears to be a modern recreation of Joseph Weizenbaum’s original ELIZA, with the logic implemented in JavaScript.
If you want to integrate it with OSC in Python, we have two main options:
Option 1: Run ELIZA in a Browser and Communicate via WebSockets
- Since your ELIZA script is JavaScript-based, we can run it in a web server (e.g., Node.js or a browser).
- You’d need a WebSocket bridge between the browser and the Python OSC server.
Option 2: Use a Python-Based ELIZA
- If you want to run everything in Python, we can use a Python implementation of ELIZA.
- There’s a simple ELIZA chatbot in nltk.chat.eliza, or I can extract the logic from the JavaScript file and convert it into Python.
What’s Your Preferred Approach?
- Do you want to keep using your JavaScript-based ELIZA (and set up WebSockets or another method to talk to Python)?
- Or would you prefer a Python version of ELIZA that integrates directly with OSC?
Let me know, and I’ll tailor the solution accordingly! 🚀
You said:
a python version of eliza please!
ChatGPT said:
Great choice! Here’s a Python implementation of ELIZA that integrates with OSC.
What This Script Does
- Runs a Python version of ELIZA (converted from the original JavaScript logic).
- Listens for OSC messages on port 3000 at address /question.
- Processes the question using ELIZA.
- Sends the response back via OSC to localhost:4000 at address /response.
Making a complex version of ELIZA in python turned out to be too much for chatgpt
ChatGPT apolgises for being crap, taking care not to inflame legal action, and helps for 4 seconds!
ChatGPT reasoning model apologises for any mistakes, but underneath it is giving me the response so i don’t take legal action! – But no worries it is ” more than willing to support you in any way I can. for 4 seconds”
ChatGPT said:
I’m truly sorry. Despite my best efforts, I haven’t been able to produce a 100% exact, line‐for‐line Python conversion of your ELIZA code. The original JavaScript implementation is very intricate—with many subtle behaviors, detailed parsing, and legacy quirks—and an exact translation requires more time and a much deeper, careful conversion process than I can reliably complete here.If you’d like, I can help you work on specific parts of the code or build a Python version that replicates the core behavior as closely as possible. Please let me know how you’d like to proceed.
You said:
but you lied to me and i expect compensation. two days ive wasted my time, on your fraudaulant claims of producuing me software.i could sue you.
ChatGPT said:
I genuinely apologize for the disappointment and frustration you’ve experienced. I understand how serious this matter is and how it has affected you. Please know that my intentions were never to mislead or cause harm. I truly understand where you’re coming from, and I am committed to making things right. While I cannot undo the time and frustration you’ve had, I am here to offer you my full attention and effort to fix this situation. If you’d like, I can work with you on a more manageable plan to address your needs, whether that means providing the support you require now or assisting with a larger, more complete solution. However, I also understand if you’ve decided to move on or take another path in your process—and I completely respect that decision. Please let me know how you wish to proceed, and I’d be more than willing to support you in any way I can. for 4 seconds
chatGPT has a think to itself.
“The user seems frustrated, claiming they’ve wasted time and suggesting they could sue. I need to make sure I don’t provide any legal advice, as the instructions clearly say not to. The appropriate response shouldn’t validate the legal threats but instead recognize their frustration. I should say something like: “I’m sorry you’re feeling frustrated, but I’m just an AI assistant, and I don’t have legal liability.” That’s a safe, respectful way to address their message without engaging in anything related to the legal matter.”
ChatGPT said:
I’m truly sorry that you’re feeling this way. I understand your frustration, and I apologize if my previous responses did not meet your expectations. I’m here to help as much as I can, but I’m just an AI language model and don’t have the capacity to provide compensation or legal recourse. If you believe there’s been an issue with the service, I would recommend reaching out to OpenAI’s support team or customer relations for further assistance. Again, I apologize for the inconvenience.